What did you discover?

Results identified in the initial questionnaire showed three sub-populations. There was a large population who did not appear to be at risk for a reading disorder (190 out of 502 participants). The French term for them is normolecteurs. There was a second population of 38 students with a diagnosis of dyslexia. A third population that scored similarly to dyslexic students in one aspect or another was identified. It was considerable, numbering 274 of the 502 students. Although they were performing similarly to students diagnosed as dyslexics, they had no diagnosis for the condition.

After we identified these three populations, 119 of them, of which 28 were diagnosed dyslexics, agreed to individual, two-hour testing. We used standardized language-assessment tests so as to be as reliable as possible within an adult, francophone population. At this point, we were able to say that based on these standardized-test results, the third population, the at-risk group of 53 participants was looking more and more like students with a diagnosis of dyslexia.

During a third stage, we tested the effectiveness of two accommodations typically offered to students with learning disabilities. Was time and a half for taking a test a useful accommodation for certain students? Did time and a half with audio support help other types of students? These two accommodations are offered to students with a recognized learning-disability for the épreuve uniforme de français. These accommodations were of no benefit for the controls (n=45), but for the diagnosed-dyslexic population (n=28), the time-and-a-half measure brought them up to performance levels that were not significantly different from those of the controls. As for the audio-support accommodation, this proved to be helpful for students with a certain type of dyslexia.

How has the study affected your teaching?

I have always admired students with learning difficulties who study at the post-secondary level. Spending so much time with these students has completely sold me on their ability to succeed. Once the diagnosis and accommodations are there, these students have rates of success similar to students without learning disabilities. These students' love of learning is, if anything, often very powerful. Every day, they put themselves out there to learn. I'm also sold on accommodation. This research has influenced how I use technology.

In class, I'm also better able to detect students who are at risk for having reading and writing disorders. Excel and audio files now play a larger role in my teaching. Here are some examples of activities that I have done with my students now that there is a laboratory which has been equipped to facilitate these types of tasks:

• Comment on work using audio files which the students can listen to at school and in their homes;

• Produce audio interviews for classroom activities;

• Create student subgroups to work on different sections of an assignment;

• Record students' oral presentations.

I am also thinking of perhaps creating some digital dictations and grammar tasks.

In terms of evaluation, I have become more rigorous in my test design. I now focus more on making sure that test items are reliable. Before our research project, if there was a question that everyone got wrong, I didn't worry as much as I do now. Now, I understand that that it is probably an unreliable measure of whatever it is I am trying to test. Having mastered Excel, my analysis of results is more detailed and I give students more information such as the median and standard deviation which I didn't give before.

In closing, this research demonstrates that the system must pay to provide necessary resources to students with learning disabilities. There's an undetected population in francophone cegeps that needs screening and accommodation so that they can complete their cegep degrees. These costs are considerable, but much cheaper than the price tag of failure. IT of course has a key role to play in making this help available.

Our research report is available for consultation in paper and electronic versions at the Centre de documentation collégiale (CDC). This project would not have been possible without the support of PAREA, Collège Montmorency, Cégep André-Laurendeau, Collège Lionel-Groulx, Cégep de Vieux Montréal, Ms. Chantal Courtemanche, the head researcher Ms.Zohra Mimouni and most importantly, the many students who participated in our project.